> Free speech has a legal definition, and Twitter doesn’t qualify. The legal definition of free speech is based on a moral principle, for which Twitter does qu

> Free speech has a legal definition, and Twitter doesn’t qualify. The legal definition of free speech is based on a moral principle, for which Twitter does qualify. When a platform such as Twitter or Facebook becomes the de facto public square, then a ban from Twitter or Facebook is a de facto ban from the public square. I don't care about Milo in particular, but I do care about the fact that censorship by Twitter or Facebook is real censorship.