3 ms·
That was actually one of the less impressive things the demo did, since it replaced the tree with what is essentially a smooth gradient. This is something that
by jcl 17y ago
That was actually one of the less impressive things the demo did, since it replaced the tree with what is essentially a smooth gradient. This is something that can be done by early image inpainting algorithms, such as this one from SIGGRAPH 2000:
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mbertalmio/restoration.html http://www.iua.upf.es/~mbertalmio/restoration.html
- jerf 17y agoYes, but you have to give it some credit for deciding to use a smooth gradient, when it is clearly not the only choice. (Also, it's hard to tell in this video exactly what it really replaced it with, at the pixel level.)