3 ms·
Putting the court of public opinion aside for a moment, I think it's good for a company to hire an outside investigator to get to the truth, but I'm also concer
by Overtonwindow 10y ago
Putting the court of public opinion aside for a moment, I think it's good for a company to hire an outside investigator to get to the truth, but I'm also concerned that when you get right down to it, it's the company that is to be protected. Yes they may get rid of bad employees, yes they may project a transparent investigation and its results, but at the end of the day it doesn't really do much for the people involved. It only serves to protect the company. Out of this I would like to see Tor and other silicon valley companies focus more on protecting the rights of employees, both those harmed, and those accused, until all the evidence is in, and then take steps to remedy the situation for those employees. So many of these investigations, from GitHub and Go Grid, to now Tor, is about protecting the companies and their executives. Only when that changes will things be better.
- jessaustin 10y ago"Tor" is not a company. The Tor Project is an international organization responsible only to its members, not to any investors.
- niij 10y agoDo you know anything about Tor? Because they're not a company responsible to their "executives", they're a non-profit. Although it may shock you: the world doesn't revolve around the startup scene in San Fransisco.