4 ms·
140 Characters; 100% agree, it should have been a minimum requirement of the message length instead maximum.
by iRobbery 10y ago
140 Characters; 100% agree, it should have been a minimum requirement of the message length instead maximum.
- rch 10y agoEffective comment, and you still have 32 characters to spare.
- iRobbery 10y ago:) Nah, (confirmed by downvotes hehe) it is not really that effective comment imho either. It is a common (quick) thought i think many will have that read paragraph about the 140 char limit. And my statement is not very specific, nor a 'fix' for the problem and could be argued to be untrue for.. other reasons (e.g. the more you write the more chance a certain point will not be agreed upon by reader and discards the whole message because of that, and sorts) And I could have dedicated pages on how much you write isn't that important, often it is the reader, that can't be arsed to read it anyway. If twitter would do a bit more on rewarding 'good' (and yes.. who am i to say what is good) behaviour; though some might describe that again as censorship. Creating another discussion.