3 ms·
You'd have a pretty low opinion of digg engineers to think they'd optimize that poorly. Which the article author does. It's actually pretty depressing to see
by spamizbad 17y ago
You'd have a pretty low opinion of digg engineers to think they'd optimize that poorly. Which the article author does.
It's actually pretty depressing to see content like this from an alleged Database expert. I've never been able to get 1:1 results between "lab" tests and actual deployments, and I've gone to much greater lengths than the author to simulate workloads.
- gill_bates 17y agoDid we read the same article? The one I read made ample disclaimers about it being nothing even remotely approximating a serious benchmark.
- ahk 17y agoAnd still uses those same worthless benchmarks to try to prove the point of sqldbs ability to scale.
- WorkerBee 17y agoHe wasn't aiming for 1:1, he was trying for a ballpark, and he got 1000:1 improvement on modest hardware. On a fricking laptop. That's all in the article.