5 ms·
I think the key to qualifying something as a sense means that it provides info external to the mind and body, i.e. the whole organism. Proprioception doesn't q
by dmfdmf 10y ago
I think the key to qualifying something as a sense means that it provides info external to the mind and body, i.e. the whole organism. Proprioception doesn't qualify as a sense by this standard. It depends on where you draw the line. You could include it if you defined sense as providing inputs to the mind only but that commits you to the mind/body dichotomy.
- pavel_lishin 10y agoI'm fine with a mind/body dichotomy. When I'm asleep, I'm not aware of anything, but I toss and turn. When I wake up in the morning, I instantly know where all my limbs are. I can also move my arms around my desk with my eyes closed, and reach towards things even if I can't see them - I know the position of my arms without any other senses. I'm not sure why that doesn't qualify as a sense.
- dmfdmf 10y ago> I'm not sure why that doesn't qualify as a sense. It does given your definition and does not given mine. There is no contradiction here just alternative ways of slicing up reality using abstractions. There is nothing inherently wrong with slicing things up your way as long as your definitions are clear and used consistently. Nevertheless, for my money the mind/body dichotomy is an error but why I think that would be a whole different discussion. ;-)