5 ms·
In this particular thread, she's not being slammed for stock performance (although it seems questionable whether she had much effect either way), but rather the
by shepardrtc 10y ago
In this particular thread, she's not being slammed for stock performance (although it seems questionable whether she had much effect either way), but rather the "perks" she negotiated for herself as the company got swallowed up by a bigger - and probably less benevolent - entity.
What she did isn't illegal, nor is it particularly unexpected these days. But it is selfish and slightly grandiose. No one is questioning how much she was paid during her tenure, just this fluffy extra crap at the end that makes it seem like she was royalty. While it shouldn't be made illegal, it should be shamed to a degree. Because if not, then where does it end?