4 ms·
> This is not the profession of saints and Buddhas. It's a choice, not a lifestyle. Full enlightenment, or being a Buddha, is the realization all of this arou
by kordless 10y ago
> This is not the profession of saints and Buddhas.
It's a choice, not a lifestyle.
Full enlightenment, or being a Buddha, is the realization all of this around you is Buddha Nature. Each individual is capable of attaining enlightenment in a single moment, given choice is made in very similar moments throughout the day. When you decide to believe it, you do so in a timeframe that is non-measurable. Like many people I know in SV, I believe we're running in a simulation. This belief could be viewed as equivalent to a type of enlightenment.
On the other hand, saints are beyond this reality and are "holy" in nature. Holiness means they have been re-integrated with the supreme wisdom, or all knowledge. Some call it the fucking oneness. Aldous Huxley called it the "burning brightness of unmitigated Reality". Technically, they are enlightened, but they are outside what we HERE can consider as Buddha Nature.
I liken these two concepts to security through obscurity. We don't know the proper protocols to realize that we are all the same thing and refuse to think about the fact we'll all be reintegrated into the brightness when it comes for us.
- arpa 10y agoThere lies a difference between Bodhisattva and Buddha. What you described while explaining the difference between Buddhas and saints is essentially the difference between Bodhisattvas and Buddhas :) And Bodhisattva is a lifestyle by choice. But then again, what do i know. I barely follow the eightfold path.