3 ms·
It is for people that aren't socially adept (which one can learn btw) and this is of course also one important criteria for sexual selection. My view is that i
by DominikR 10y ago
It is for people that aren't socially adept (which one can learn btw) and this is of course also one important criteria for sexual selection.
My view is that it is not in the interest of women (who mostly do the selecting while men do the approaching) to use a process for selection that obfuscates if the approaching person is socially adept or not.
It is maybe just my experience, but generally women do know which men are interested and which are not, even if the male didn't make an approach yet.
- BatFastard 10y agoDo you have a set of suggested resources for learning to be social adept. Its too late for me, but I am hoping to teach it on to my version 2.0 systems.
- splouk 10y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influence_People https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influen... A good start.
- Kalium 10y agoLong story short: use their names and feed their egos. Ignore all the stuff about sincerity and real connection, since the author does.
- splouk 10y agoI called it a 'good start' for a reason. Obviously there is a lot more to social success than charm and flattery, but they are important regardless.
- dejawu 10y agoYou could say that if you've made it to v2.0, you have already been evolutionarily selected in your favor.
- Grishnakh 10y agoIf you have version 2.0 systems, how'd you do that without being socially adept? Did you adopt them as a single person or something? If you've managed to convince someone to procreate with you (and multiple times at that, apparently), then you're by definition socially adept.
- eru 10y agoTry practice?