4 ms·
The most impressive thing about it, is that they still manage to put in so much useful stuff in such a small amount of time. If this keeps up, I doubt I'll ever
by JeanPierre 17y ago
The most impressive thing about it, is that they still manage to put in so much useful stuff in such a small amount of time. If this keeps up, I doubt I'll ever use more than 30 minutes to photoshop an image. Ever.
- jacobolus 17y ago> they still manage to put in so much useful stuff in such a small amount of time. What do you mean? It’s a 20-year-old program. If every year or two you implement 3 or 4 SIGGRAPH papers, after a decade you too will have quite a nifty thing. > I doubt I'll ever use more than 30 minutes to photoshop an image. Ever. Depends what your job description is. If you’re a retoucher paid by the photo, this is already pretty much true. If you’re a perfectionist artist, it will probably never be.
- JeanPierre 17y agoI'm not into SIGGRAPH papers, though if they implement those, it would explain the short time it takes to make. I am, however, still amazed by the possibilities of Photoshop: Photoshop shows us how the human brain is capable of finding patterns in nature and copy that realistically. Surely, the latter comment was an overstatement if you're working professionally with Photoshop. But I do think it sooner or later would be some truth in my statement: If Photoshop manage to imitate realism well enough that humans don't see mistakes, then the only thing they would have to work on is speeding up the algorithm. (in that area of Photoshop, of course)
- ra 17y agoWhat impresses me is how simple the interface is for this new feature... select, delete ... wait... done.