3 ms·
This isn't ruby, not everything's an object. A subject is literally the opposite. At least a human is "unantastbar" (inviolable, literally untouchable, in the
by posterboy 10y ago
This isn't ruby, not everything's an object. A subject is literally the opposite.
At least a human is "unantastbar" (inviolable, literally untouchable, in the sense of objectivity not tangable) by law. We grant dead body's almost the same respect and I wouldn't contest it, although I find that dead living being is an oxymoron.
- Tomte 10y agoI have no idea what you're talking about.
- posterboy 10y ago> this literal interpretation of the statute's wording is eschewed in favor of a more restrictive interpretation I have no idea what you are talking about. What's more or less restrictive, can you explain? > this example is actually mentioned in the legal literature. I have no idea what legal literature you are talking about.