4 ms·
To see the corrections made to the article to reflect this information, see the following link. https://web.archive.org/web/20160726000303/https://trln7wscq2jj
by dublinben 10y ago
To see the corrections made to the article to reflect this information, see the following link.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160726000303/https://trln7wscq2jjwlnl.onion.to/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160726000303/https://trln7wscq...
- divbit 10y ago{+This blog has been updated to reflect that WikiLeaks promoted links to the+} {+databases via its social media accounts but did not host those databases on its+} {+own site.+} So they tweeted / or retweeted it essentially?
- korayal 10y agoyes, the tweet is still live: (but the linked url is taken down so I don't see any reason not to share this tweet) https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/756147693802643456 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/756147693802643456 I think the misunderstanding (if there is any) is that they share this link by calling it 'theirs'. So I suppose that would be the reason the author was referring to them.