3 ms·
OP is kidding, I can identify the first statement as the pre-quantum ultraviolet catastrophe argument where everything warmer than absolute zero should emit one
by VLM 10y ago
OP is kidding, I can identify the first statement as the pre-quantum ultraviolet catastrophe argument where everything warmer than absolute zero should emit one single honkin big gamma ray and drop back to absolute zero, whereas in practice blackbody radiation doesn't go to infinity with short wavelengths but goes to a peak (for example "red hot steel")
What I can't identify by name is the philosophical arguments in the other statements.
I'm about 90% sure one is a metaphysical Copenhagen interpretation of QM (You've heard of Heisenberg's lucky cat?) but I'm not as certain as the UV catastrophe analogy. Depends how you read it, I guess.
- T0T0R0 10y agoWho are you, and how did you find me??? (...and it's Schrödinger's Cat)