4 ms·
It is legal to view something, regardless of whether the source is licensed. Copyright only prevents producing and distributing unlicensed copies, i.e. uploadi
by deepnet 10y ago
It is legal to view something, regardless of whether the source is licensed.
Copyright only prevents producing and distributing unlicensed copies, i.e. uploading or sharing - it does not cover viewing or downloading.
You may not agree with the law but nonetheless there is no prohibition against viewing an unauthorised copy.
-- can't reply below ? So replying here.
> as legal as buying a stolen tv.
Buying stolen goods is an offense in law. Buying an unauthorised copy is not.
> How is downloading not creating a copy? There was one file before you downloaded it, now there are two.
Yes, but it is not copyright infringement. Making a local copy for the purposes of viewing a web page, a picture or other digital media is not copyright infringement, this is well established by precedent.
- arcticfox 10y agoHow is downloading not creating a copy? There was one file before you downloaded it, now there are two.
- 6d6b73 10y agoIt's about as legal as buying a stolen TV.
- snovv_crash 10y agoI think a knockoff TV would be a better analogy.
- wolfgke 10y agoI don't think this is a good analogy either: Since at a knockoff TV the seller deceives the buyer that the TV is an original. So it's a clear case of fraud.