5 ms·
Note: This is my personal opinion! I recently had to use a computer with OS X Mavericks on it (10.9 I think). I was struck by how beautiful the interface was.
by 0942v8653 10y ago
Note: This is my personal opinion!
I recently had to use a computer with OS X Mavericks on it (10.9 I think). I was struck by how beautiful the interface was. I'm having trouble finding a good screenshot illustrating this, but compare
http://content.gcflearnfree.org/topics/243/2013_new_desktop.jpg http://content.gcflearnfree.org/topics/243/2013_new_desktop....
http://download.softwsp.com/sites/12/2015/11/os-x-el-capitan-mac-012.jpg http://download.softwsp.com/sites/12/2015/11/os-x-el-capitan...
Everything just looks better on Mavericks. The gradients may be over-the-top but they're at least consistent. Transparency on El Capitan is pointless and ugly. Maybe I like the system font a little better.
Firefox is also a really good example; it looked great on Mavericks but has not been able to fit in since.
Usually, I prefer simple UIs: i3, terminals, etc.. But the look they have done for Yosemite/El Capitan just doesn't work.
- daenney 10y agoFirefox's problem is that it does the whole UI by itself. This basically makes it look out of place anywhere they haven't explicitly put effort into giving it a similar experience. It looks out of place on El Capitan and on macOS Sierra it's downright disturbing. I don't want tab titles in Times New Roman (at least it reminds me of that).
- Sean1708 10y ago> Times New Roman (at least it reminds me of that). Really? The tab titles on my firefox are very clearly a sans-serif font, and don't look at all out of place.
- daenney 10y agoCould be that that got fixed. I don't use Firefox on a daily basis so I tend to be a few builds behind on the beta channel.
- vacri 10y agoNo tab titles in TNR in FF here - sanserif (but can't tell a font by sight). No add-ons apart from NoScript and Flashblock.
- cocotino 10y agoMaybe they've fixed it but the address bar had an atrocious amount of glow. It is clearly out of place.
- hellofunk 10y agoOne of those URLs you've posted results in a banned security error in Chrome, with the strong recommendation not to visit it due to malicious activity on that site.
- k-mcgrady 10y agoWarning in Safari too.
- philjohn 10y agoI find the UI in Mavericks overly fussy and cluttered. Horses for courses though, you like what you like.
- spronkey 10y agoHorses for courses indeed. Mavericks is the pinnacle of Aqua for me. Beautiful, great typography, great affordances, a little bit of character.
- jventura 10y agoI agree with you on Mavericks vs El Capitan. My Mac is still on Mavericks and I intend to keep it like that as long as I can..
- gkya 10y agoCertainly beautiful but the problem is: on the dock, the stuff between Safari and Photos are indistinguishable at first sight. If I used that, I'd have to hover on some of them to pick Pages, or Notes, or Contacts among them.
- eddieh 10y agoThe transparency is worse than pointless. It is so distracting and ugly, it makes using macOS awful. When scrolling though a webpage (on macOS & iOS) the flickering color of the titlebar always makes me think the display is starting to fail — then I remember it's the stupid transparency.
- leadingthenet 10y agoThe transparency is pointless, though I much prefer the look of El Cap.