2 ms·
It's not just the fact that "people can recognise a button even if it's flat" that is the issue (I often hear people making this argument) but that the differen
by oneeyedpigeon 10y ago
It's not just the fact that "people can recognise a button even if it's flat" that is the issue (I often hear people making this argument) but that the differentiation between what is a button and what isn't (e.g. what is normal text) is reduced in flat design. It is possible to make 'non-buttons' work as buttons, but only if their function is clearly indicated via other means.
This is the beauty of the traditional, three-dimensional, consistently-styled buttons: you get a 'button' by default without having to hint that it's a button using other means.