5 ms·
No, this has nothing to do with his political views. Chomsky's work is still seen as something of a foundation of modern linguistics and it's still taught in b
by BjoernKW 10y ago
No, this has nothing to do with his political views.
Chomsky's work is still seen as something of a foundation of modern linguistics and it's still taught in basic classes at university. It's also been very seminal in that it's brought about a vast array of models and theories that build upon it, including modern models such as the various phrase structure grammars (HPSG for instance).
However, the world of linguistics has changed quite a bit since the 1960s and through areas such as NLP and statistical models in particular we have a far better understanding of the building blocks of human language. Chomsky appears to be somewhat desperately trying to keep up with these changes and accommodate them in his models, which in turn have grown vastly more complex over the years compared with his original simple and elegant x' theory. In recent years, he also comes across as quite stubborn regarding his rejection of statistic models and machine learning.
- foldr 10y ago>Chomsky appears to be somewhat desperately trying to keep up with these changes Not sure where you're getting that from. Which aspects of Chomsky's recent work do you think are drive by some kind of desire to keep up with developments in NLP? >his models, which in turn have grown vastly more complex over the years compared with his original simple and elegant x' theory X' theory was not really 'original'. It was first introduced in Remarks on Nominalization in 1970. The models have not in fact grown vastly more complex. In a number of respects quite significant simplifications have been achieved (e.g. the reduction of large numbers of construction-specific transformational rules to a small number of generalizations about A and A' movement).