5 ms·
Haskell, Ocaml, etc. There's nothing at all functional about Common Lisp, not even a little bit, far from it, if anything the opposite.
by justin_vanw 10y ago
Haskell, Ocaml, etc. There's nothing at all functional about Common Lisp, not even a little bit, far from it, if anything the opposite.
- lispm 10y agoWhich is nonsense. Common Lisp and its implementations supports some parts of Functional Programming: * First Class Functions * Higher Order Functions * Anonymous Functions * Lexical Binding * Closures * TCO is supported by a variety of implementations