I meant to use them as an example of monetising the solution of problems - but not necessarily solving problems for money. They find that they have solved a pr

I meant to use them as an example of monetising the solution of problems - but not necessarily solving problems for money. They find that they have solved a problem (not necessarily the one they were looking to solve) and then make huge amounts of money in selling the 'solution'. Of course, the majority of their solutions are also for problems of convenience - easing the symptoms but not curing the problem. I apologise if it came across as supporting them - I am certainly against the monopoly of big pharma, in the same way that GMO is also capitalising on convenience.