I feel like the logical outgrowth of an argument like this is that we could compel companies to allow certain types of speech and not others. This seems like a

I feel like the logical outgrowth of an argument like this is that we could compel companies to allow certain types of speech and not others. This seems like a pretty clear violation of both free association and freedom of the press. You would never think to compel a newspaper to publish a certain type of news or a certain columnist, why should Google be compelled to publish anything it doesn't like?