3 ms·
This is just a gutter hit-piece on Peter Thiel because he isn't falling in line like the rest of SV. There is zero actual substance here, the author takes a si
by ZoF 10y ago
This is just a gutter hit-piece on Peter Thiel because he isn't falling in line like the rest of SV.
There is zero actual substance here, the author takes a single anecdote from his book, interprets it to mean that Thiel thinks running a small business is not worthwhile and then proceeds to end with this:
-----------------------------------------
Silicon Valley, too, is of two minds. There are those who recognize that their uniquely innovative culture is a precipitate of a lot of expensive long-term institutional investment on the part of governments, universities and corporations, and that to function in a democracy you need to worry about stuff you personally don’t think is important. And there are those who believe only in charisma and prowess, the blinding insight and iron will that get you from zero to one.
-----------------------------------------
Silicon Valley isn't of two minds, it is of many; and no, the uniquely innovative culture isn't the sole result of expensive long-term institutional investment on the part of governments.
- forgetsusername 10y ago>no, the uniquely innovative culture isn't the sole result of expensive long-term institutional investment on the part of governments What's the reason then? Are the people just better and smarter there?
- icebraining 10y agoI'd say a few smarter/innovative individuals can imprint a culture to a place that is self-sustaining. For example, William Shockley's transistor company brought a bunch of smart PhDs to what was at the time a rural area (Mountain View). A few of these PhDs - called the "traitorous eight" - left to work on their own. Over 65 companies in the area over the next 20 years came from there, including Intel and AMD. You know why William Shockley chose SV? Because his mother lived in Palo Alto.