To be fair, while I do understand the point of the article, it does focus on stuff that isn't really accurate (eg. shampoo, soap, etc). It seems a regurgitation

To be fair, while I do understand the point of the article, it does focus on stuff that isn't really accurate (eg. shampoo, soap, etc). It seems a regurgitation of some documentaries about how society advanced with muslims, while in fact most - if not all - achievements where done before the rise of islam. Muslims aren't an ethnicity, they are practicioners of a specific religion. I'd argue that the fall of the persian empire (for which muslim fanatics contributed to) caused more damage to every aspect of society than all 1500 years of "muslim innovations" combined.