You'd have to be more precise. Because all the inventions or discoveries (or natural resources found on territories that are currently occupied by the muslims)

You'd have to be more precise. Because all the inventions or discoveries (or natural resources found on territories that are currently occupied by the muslims), would have mostly been still invented, discovered and of course existed in all hypotheses: - whether there would be no Arab, (and therefore no Mohamed, and no islam). The discoveries and natural resources would still have occured, only more easily and earlier, by the same (non Arab) people, with even more intelligent scientists in those people, since now they wouldn't have been oppressed by islam. - whether there would just be no muslim (because islam would not have exited). Then, assuming Arabs wouldn't have had such a deleterious role, invading, pillaging, enslaving, raping and killing everybody everywhere they go (but have limited themselves to a role of commerce, transport and exchange), then even more so, those discoveries and natural resources would still have occured, more easily and earlier, by the same (non Arab) people, with even more intelligent scientists in those people, since now they wouldn't have been oppressed by Arabs.