3 ms·
It is possible that Google or some governmental entity believed that one of the many naked "18 year olds" was not actually 18 when the posted photos were taken.
by mgraczyk 10y ago
It is possible that Google or some governmental entity believed that one of the many naked "18 year olds" was not actually 18 when the posted photos were taken. The comments on the linked post suggest that at least one reader of the blog believed that at least one escort was not 18.
That seems like adequate evidence for scrutiny, and it is possible that Google plays it safe in cases like these (I have no idea what their official policy is).
- vertex-four 10y agoIndeed - as anyone hosting pornography knows, it's generally on the people who took the photo, the people who uploaded it, and the people who are hosting it to have proof that their models are over age. If it turns out they're not, there's a risk of everyone who handled the photo being complicit in distribution of child pornography.
- Sylos 10y agoSomething somewhere went horrible wrong when simply deleting a person's artistic life is how you play it safe.