> In a nutshell, at university I would fail a paper if I didn’t compare at least two, if not three opposing views on a topic. Taking one telling of events as go

> In a nutshell, at university I would fail a paper if I didn’t compare at least two, if not three opposing views on a topic. Taking one telling of events as gospel doesn’t wash in the comparative analytical method of research that forms the core of British academia. I thought this was a great line. I wish people could bring this into general thinking and journalism. Showing some understanding, and then likely empathy, to other views is likely one of the best things we can introduce to being a more peaceful and generally better world.