I would disagree with the 'almost uniformly' but I understand your point. I would tend to exempt arstechnica for example. I feel like most of the issue comes w

I would disagree with the 'almost uniformly' but I understand your point. I would tend to exempt arstechnica for example. I feel like most of the issue comes when journalists comment or repurpose journal articles. What seems to get dropped is the background, the context, and the limitations that are often expressed in a nuanced language. In the end, as a scientist, I blame scientists...you created the knowledge, try and take some ownership of it (having been in the situation myself).