3 ms·
what you say is true, but what I said is also truly what I wanted to say, so to clarify: NYC has widespread ignoring of many traffic laws, and that does not bo
by blastrat 10y ago
what you say is true, but what I said is also truly what I wanted to say, so to clarify:
NYC has widespread ignoring of many traffic laws, and that does not bother me. I am talking about, in the context of widespread violations, what does bother me: the electric bikes. You could accept that there is some validity in what I say without agreeing with me.
Given the choice, I would not be in favor of pedestrians and bikers being forced to follow all traffic laws. However, I would be in favor of electric bikes being forced to follow all traffic laws, especially the one that bans them! :)
- krirken 10y agoI see, and I agree that the accountability of cyclists (and slightly less so for motorists) in NYC is almost zero. I also agree that electric powered bicycles should be held to a higher standard than normal bikes, particularly in that their use is entirely illegal so it should be much easier to spot and ticket them. I mostly posted these facts because most non-NYCers don't even realize that these uses of a bike are actually against the law. EDIT: I just read your edit, > I find electric bikes even more destabilizing and most objectionable, because they are faster and quieter, and I think because they are favored by a statistical sample that skews toward more selfish/self-interested. This is a good summary of my thoughts about electrical bicycles as well.