>A 2007 study by University of Michigan researchers seemed to back Gesell up, showing those living within 2 miles of the Field Laboratory were 60 percent more l

>A 2007 study by University of Michigan researchers seemed to back Gesell up, showing those living within 2 miles of the Field Laboratory were 60 percent more likely to be stricken with cancers of the thyroid, upper digestive tract, bladder, blood and lymph tissue than those who lived more than 5 miles away. What's the likelihood that a randomly selected geographic point in the U.S. will yield that same contrast of 60%?