The point I'm trying to raise is the potential for publication bias. If publishing results that challenge the narrative is a risk to your career, you won't publ

The point I'm trying to raise is the potential for publication bias. If publishing results that challenge the narrative is a risk to your career, you won't publish it. Meanwhile, the outliers in the other direction, which do fit the narrative, get published and picked up by others in the field. Here's an article echoing my concerns: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10837146/Climate-change-science-has-become-blind-to-green-bias.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/1083714...