3 ms·
I know what you mean. But I think in part it's just because things don't stay 'in focus' for very long any more. In the news world, one or two days is now all
by CM30 10y ago
I know what you mean.
But I think in part it's just because things don't stay 'in focus' for very long any more. In the news world, one or two days is now all it takes for stuff to be seen as 'old hat', with the timing going down to maybe about two or three hours in the gaming world.
So for journalists, it's more profitable/attention grabbing to get anything out 'right now' that it is to do the research and delay the piece.
It might also be because the first news site to post about something interesting can often claim to be the 'source', even if they're really just writing about something that's already been posted elsewhere. Most journalists don't actually check for the original page or paper, they just reference the site they heard it discussed on.
So being quick can also get a bunch of equally rushed sites linking back to your work as if it was the original source. That can be awfully good for your page rank or whatever...
Either way, it's almost always better (for the journalist/news site/media source) to be the first to print something than to cover it most accurately. That's just how the increasingly quick news cycle works online.