4 ms·
Not ceding classic liberalism with the word is the point. (Because ceding too much of it puts you at danger of a populist takeover, i.e., "literally Hitler".)
by pythia__ 10y ago
Not ceding classic liberalism with the word is the point. (Because ceding too much of it puts you at danger of a populist takeover, i.e., "literally Hitler".)
Land explains this better (mentioning Thiel, too) at http://www.xenosystems.net/nrx-and-liberalism/ http://www.xenosystems.net/nrx-and-liberalism/. His thinking there should apply broadly to all non-left (non-)politics.
- elgabogringo 10y agoSkimmed the beginning, will read the rest later. Liberalism is definitely modern (it's from the enlightenment), it's definitely British (ie. has nothing to do with Rousseau)... I'll have to read more to see why the author thinks it's not political. I personally like that they are embracing "progressive" more. I think it's more accurate than "liberal" and uniquely theirs.