3 ms·
"science agreed upon by a majority of scientists including more than two 9s" == "liberal orthodox line". I'm sure you have far better research, data and analyt
by colemickens 10y ago
"science agreed upon by a majority of scientists including more than two 9s" == "liberal orthodox line".
I'm sure you have far better research, data and analytical ability than NASA and virtually every other scientific outfit on the planet.
- throwaway136373 10y agoAnd scientists are never ever wrong in their predictions.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- theseadroid 10y agoAnd doctors are never ever wrong in their diagnosis. Or don't they? But you still go to doctors instead of diagnose yourself?
- eagsalazar2 10y agoNo one is saying that but at least, unlike you, scientists have attempted to make a case (as have several other people on this thread). I'm inclined to go with the people who've studied this subject, made arguments, were peer reviewed at least by each other, even with the reality of their human failings and biases.
- jwatte 10y agoDoes there exist, in your mind, any data that would make you think global warming is real and imminent? If so, what would that data look like?
- yongjik 10y agoNah, it's just that people generally don't like to work with someone who claims "Scientists are wrong," and when asked how he/she knows it, answers "Well, they've been wrong before!" Because who wants to argue with such a person in a design meeting?