4 ms·

It's not suing an employee for talking to reporters. That doesn't make sense. Most company exits include an NDA clause which would prevent talking to reporters

It's not suing an employee for talking to reporters. That doesn't make sense. Most company exits include an NDA clause which would prevent talking to reporters so the statement does make sense. Except you're totally right thats not what she's really being sued for.

falcolas 10y ago
Such clauses only come into effect if you take the severance package. So, while you can say it's likely the employee was under a non-disparagement agreement, it's not a certainty.
- bdcravens 10y ago
  Generally NDA refers to non-disclosure, not non-disparagement.
  - falcolas 10y ago
    Yes, but it's also generally a non-disparagement which would stop former employees from speaking negatively about their former company to the press.