Yes! I applaud this attitude of Elm, of keep breaking the language to improve on it (It still hasn't reach 1.0). It has the disadvantage of breaking previous c

Yes! I applaud this attitude of Elm, of keep breaking the language to improve on it (It still hasn't reach 1.0). It has the disadvantage of breaking previous code and making previous learning resources obsolete, but on the other hand, the language keeps evolving and improving. There's an article on why they changed from signals to commands/subscriptions. They argue that this change was needed, as signals was a concept that was hard and could be make unnecessary by the new system, which was easier.