3 ms·
Well, they also contend that the "lease" was violated. So there's that. If you continually poke about in doors around the apartment building that the landlord s
by delinka 10y ago
Well, they also contend that the "lease" was violated. So there's that. If you continually poke about in doors around the apartment building that the landlord says you're not allowed to, there'a also a good chance you'll be asked to leave the premises.
- tptacek 10y agoWhat "lease"? WeWork is month-to-month.
- peterbonney 10y agoThe claim is that the tenant violated the WeWork terms of service (very much akin to a lease, albeit a short-term one) by scraping member data through the WeWork API.
- tptacek 10y agoYes, I understand that. I'm going further and saying that anyone working here should expect to lose their spot for any reason or no reason on a monthly --- meaning, effectively, instantaneous --- basis. I have a lot of negative things to say about WeWork as a business, and some netting-out-positive things to say about the particular West Loop WeWork space I'm working out of right now. But most of all: I'm here with my eyes open. There's also the concern of "is WeWork even going to exist in 6 months"?
- peterbonney 10y agoGot it - apologies for misunderstanding you. I thought you were suggesting the opposite (I.e. that there is nothing to violate because of the lack of a long-term lease). :)
- michaelmrose 10y agoNot even monthly they were given 30 minutes to vacate.
- delinka 10y agoIt's in quotes continuing the analogy. If they violated the TOS, that's akin to violating the lease on your apartment.