3 ms·
Depends on which figures you look at. http://www.techspot.com/article/928-five-generations-nvidia-geforce-graphics-compared/ http://www.techspot.com/article/928
by 314 10y ago
Depends on which figures you look at. http://www.techspot.com/article/928-five-generations-nvidia-geforce-graphics-compared/ http://www.techspot.com/article/928-five-generations-nvidia-... has a reasonable comparison. Varies between 20-50% over the range of that sample. The increase in performance between the 980/1080 or the titans does not seem out of the "ordinary".
- dogma1138 10y agoLook at the final trend chart 780ti > 980 = ~15% increase 780 > 780ti = ~12% increase 680 (potentially should've used the 690 as a reference even tho it was a dGPU card but it was the) > 780 = ~27 increase. For the most part in generation that there wasn't a near ~2 year gap, and in generations where there wasn't a huge change in GPU memory type or a major architecture change (like dropping the hardware scheduler in Fermi for Kepler in order to save silicon space for things that actually matter(ed) for game at the time) there isn't a 50% increase gen to gen. 15-20% increase gen to gen with comparable price point cards (nvidia has been making it harder now by charging 150-200$ more per card and effectively bumping a price point lately) is what you should be expecting.