7 ms·
I created something similar a month ago https://github.com/olahol/reactpack https://github.com/olahol/reactpack Doesn't seem like this project differs that mu
by ola 10y ago
I created something similar a month ago
https://github.com/olahol/reactpack https://github.com/olahol/reactpack
Doesn't seem like this project differs that much, although this looks to have the backing of core React developers.
- pbreit 10y agoI don't get why they would need to lock down the configuration and then have to offer the eject thingy. Couldn't they just offer a "facebook-certified" starter pack/bootstrap? I guess you could just do an immediate eject? Edit: looks like they contemplated that in the survey: "Yes, and I will run `eject` straight away"
- danabramov 10y agoMany people (especially beginners) appreciate automatic updates of their dependencies. If you eject straight away you’ll have to manage them yourself, which is a big turnoff to many.
- pbreit 10y agoCould there be some sort of npm feature that incorporates a remote list of dependencies & versions?
- danabramov 10y agoYep, it’s called a “package”. ;-)
- pbreit 10y agoSo could whatever create-react-app is delivering be substantially approximated with an npm-based solution?
- danabramov 10y agocreate-react-app is an npm-based solution.
- sotojuan 10y ago> Couldn't they just offer a "facebook-certified" starter pack/bootstrap? No, because Facebook engineers don't use or need that. Facebook only open sources or releases stuff they use—except for this. This is actually the first and probably only open source project from Facebook that they don't use in production.