IMHO: They had a working solution, but they threw it out. When they were free-speech, they made it a policy to only throw out stuff that they were legally requi

IMHO: They had a working solution, but they threw it out. When they were free-speech, they made it a policy to only throw out stuff that they were legally required to. That allowed them to keep their hands clean. As soon as they filter one thing for non-legal reasons, they become responsible for everything else on the site, otherwise it becomes a "why did you filter me, and not them" issue. The laissez-faire attitude worked for a long time, and arguably, that's why reddit grew as popular as it did. If they had made an announcement: "Hey, we're done with free speech. Here's our plan" then I think it would have been less of a problem. But like you said, they are trying to be on two sides at once: They want the benefits of free-speech, without the costs.