3 ms·
Aside from the very real liability issue, the idea of lubricating faults is interesting. From a practical standpoint it would be hard to inject something that r
by cossatot 10y ago
Aside from the very real liability issue, the idea of lubricating faults is interesting. From a practical standpoint it would be hard to inject something that remains viscous enough at the relevant temperatures. Earthquakes nucleate at about 10 km depth in the San Andreas, which is about 350 degrees C. So aside from the difficulty of drilling in these conditions, you would have to have a fluid that maintains its viscosity from surface temperatures to 350 C.
- sevenless 10y agoGiven fracking injections are a lot shallower than 10km, I'm not sure it would have to be injected that deep. But it's a good point, that temperature will be a factor. Getting a high-melting-point fluid down there might be done by dissolving or suspending it in water that is allowed to boil off, or having a heated injection pipeline. Silicone and silicate lubricants are viable at those temperatures. Might not be viscous enough, though. A low melting phosphate glass might work.