9 ms·
Search the DNC email database
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- kiernanmcgowan 10y agoNo one escapes linkedin spam: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=i%27d+like+to+add+you+to+my+professional+network+on+linkedin&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=i%27d+like+to+add+you+to...
- chatmasta 10y agoI wonder how many hard drives could be filled with all the linkedin emails ever sent.
- jaytaylor 10y agoAbout 3 years ago I heard firsthand they were sending over a billion a month. I'm sure the numbers have only gone up...so probably quite a lot of raw data. That said, the actual overall entropy [0] is likely low (based on what I've observed in my inbox over the years; mostly just HTML templates with names and links). [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(information_theory) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(information_theory)
- kbenson 10y agoI wish someone would try their luck with the spam laws on the books against linkedin. The likelihood of a win would be very low, but the benefit if they did win would be enormous to everyone.
- jszymborski 10y agoThat's happened: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/linkedin-sued-hacking-emails-spam_n_3963195.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/linkedin-sued-hacki... http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/linkedin-class-action-email-spam-1.3260225 http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/linkedin-class-action-email-...
- kbenson 10y agoActually, I was referring more to the recipient side, not the LinkedIn user side. I don't really see a big difference between someone selling their personal address book to LinkedIn and someone supplying it automatically. In both instances, both parties benefit (the user with connections or money, and LinkedIn with new user leads), and the recipients end up with unsolicited email. Using an address book to locate existing users and present them an option to connect is one thing. Using that address book to market to unknown people through their email addresses is clearly spam.
- empath75 10y agoI was a rave promoter in the early 2000s and was using my personal email address to send out promotions for a while. I had several thousands of emails that I had collected over the years, including a few email lists that forwarded all over the country. Several years ago, I signed up for linked in, dutifully unchecked the 20 emails or so on the first page of emails and then clicked, next, after which it emailed the entire rest of my gmail contact list. I ended up in the top 5% of viewed profiles on all of linked in for the month. I felt terrible about it.
- jandrese 10y agoLinkedIn is king of dark patterns. Their webpage is full of "spam everyone you have ever known" landmines.
- nathancahill 10y ago= $26.2B.
- diyseguy 10y agoI guess Assange would like to see Trump win - quickest way to bring about the downfall of the US
- mtgx 10y agoSo corruption shouldn't be exposed because someone else may gain political advantage from it? Clinton defenders's arguments are getting stranger by the day.
- 67726e 10y agoMocking those on the opposite side of the aisle from you isn't going to help a damned thing. Maybe if everyone stopped shitting on the opposite party we'd see Congress get their shit together.
- jackmott 10y agoI don't have an aisle, so I can't mock the opposite side. But I can mock the republican aisle for having descending into complete buffoonery. If you have conservative leaning ideals I would suggest abandoning ship and starting something new. Nobody with a functioning brain is voting that way any more. It is a horrible clown show what has happened, unprecedented.
- vowelless 10y agoI don't have an aisle, so I can't mock the opposite side. But I can mock the Democratic aisle for having descending into complete buffoonery. If you have liberal leaning ideals I would suggest abandoning ship and starting something new. Nobody with a functioning brain is voting that way any more. It is a horrible clown show what has happened, unprecedented.
- 67726e 10y ago> If you have conservative leaning ideals You very much have an opposite side of the aisle wether you want to admit it or not.
- loopdedoo 10y agohttps://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=off+the+record&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=off+the+record&mfrom=&mt... "Off the record" is a fun search term to browse.
- awqrre 10y agohttps://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=otr&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=otr&mfrom=&mto=&title=&n... "otr" might be interesting too
- qiqing 10y agoOr "off the record" as a whole phrase: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=%22off+the+record%22&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=%22off+the+record%22&mfr...
- Natsu 10y agoYeah, interesting reading. I think they got more 'fingerprints' on this than they wanted, though.... > From: Daniel Strauss [dstrauss1987@me.com<mailto:dstrauss1987@me.com>] > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 12:25 PM > To: Miranda, Luis > Subject: Deep background question > > Hey > > So we want to see the list of committee appointments the Sanders Folks submitted just to verify it was mostly staffers and ineligible figures. That possible with no fingerprints attached? https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7065 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7065
- iconjack 10y ago> (Sorry I'm sending this from two email accounts. I hate the iPhone) I knew it! Lots of people secretly hate the iPhone, but won't admit it public!
- tanderson92 10y agoIn which DNC executives discuss smearing Bernie Sanders as Jewish: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508
- jackfrodo 10y agoIt's smearing him as an atheist. He's saying that southern baptists would be okay with electing a Jewish person but not an atheist.
- Natsu 10y agoWhatever the case, it sure does look as if the DNC has been playing favorites. There's more where that came from, e.g. - > From: Daniel Strauss [dstrauss1987@me.com<mailto:dstrauss1987@me.com>] > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 12:25 PM > To: Miranda, Luis > Subject: Deep background question > > Hey > > So we want to see the list of committee appointments the Sanders Folks submitted just to verify it was mostly staffers and ineligible figures. That possible with no fingerprints attached? https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7065 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7065
- thrillpot 10y agoIt's an odd difference, but that's actually alleging he's atheist. Being Jewish is considered preferable to evangelical voters.
- tanderson92 10y agoI would argue that the distinction is between smearing him because he's a secular Jew or being an atheist. They're arguing he's an insufficiently religious Jew, which is a common smear in itself against some Jews.
- deadmik3 10y agoI'm not from kentucky or west virginia, but my understanding of those places is that it would be much worse to run as an atheist than as a jew
- sickbeard 10y agoThe childish side of me typed in "penis" expecting no results. Boy was I wrong.
- drostie 10y agoNone of them are particularly interesting, though. So far I'm pretty surprised with how pedestrian it is. Even looking for the word "fuck" reveals few internal communications which use it. In one thread, some guy seems to have gotten a sub-optimal time slot for putting out Democratic-leaning news on CNN, since it's at 6AM rather than closer to near 8:20AM when, it turns out, Obama was going to deliver some statement. They asked him if he thought it was possible to move the thing forward a couple hours, and suggested that if he couldn't then they might have to withhold the news completely for a later time. And he replied with a bit of lip about how crummy that is: "They structured their whole show on that we’ll make news in the 6am hour. We told them a time. They took care of us. Now they’re all asleep. Are we really going to screw them over on our mistake???" and he follows it up with a couple more replies which are similarly irreverent but not outright bad, making a valid case (which the higher-ups seem to eventually agree with) that alienating someone who's doing you a favor is a really bad idea and they should just bite whatever bullet they're biting with the worse time-slot. They basically tell him, "You're right, we'll listen to you, but fuck off with the attitude." And that's the scope of the thing. Relatively minor. In another one, someone admitting that they're writing for FoxNews.com invites comments from them about some hit piece he's thinking about writing on the subject of Hillary Clinton maybe protecting Bill and trying to silence his accusers during his sex scandals... an internal email discussing this "opportunity" (to, presumably, have whatever their words might be, twisted) one emails to the other people in his office, "Is there a Fuck You emoji?". After some laughs they decide not to respond at all; but the guy is persistent, so the person who handles the forward says, "The asshole from fox emailed us again. I did some research and there’s still no “fuck you” emoji, unfortunately." It's pretty tame stuff so far in my browsing. Relatively professional.
- tanderson92 10y agohttps://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508 I wouldn't call that professional. I would call that conspiring to commit a civil rights violation, or exploit one.
- EvanAnderson 10y agoDNC users have local Administrator rights on their PCs, apparently. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8763 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8763
- revelation 10y agoIt says "for Surface", so maybe that's bring your own device (not necessarily better, mind you).
- geekamongus 10y ago--facepalm--
- deadmik3 10y agotried searching my full name hoping for a surprise nothing :(
- chatmasta 10y agoLots of social security numbers, credit card numbers, full names, addresses, and phone numbers of very wealthy donors in there. Also, here's one where the DNC creates fake (satirical) craigslist posts advertising jobs for Trump businesses: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
- dtien 10y agothis actually demonstrates some savvy low level marketing, seems like they were going to redirect 'applicants' to a microsite likely with more satirical anti-Trump stuff. The desire to keep the 'offensive shit ..verbatim' is also quite interesting ( I think ). 1) again, shows some savvy marketing to not step over the line into smearing 2) does anyone know if the phrases in their posts are actually taken from Trump quotes or anecdotes? They seem plausible but also a bit off the wall. In any case, somewhat interesting to see the inner workings of US political marketing machinations
- foota 10y agooff the wall eh?
- verz 10y agoNew York
- verz 10y ago"New York" "New York Bernie"
- r00fus 10y agoSounds a lot like the "New York values" smear used in the GOP side.
- verz 10y ago"New York" "New York Bernie"
- slig 10y agoSo, anyone knows which tech stack wikileaks is using to run that search?
- zo1 10y agoAnother interesting term to search for: "Donald Trump", or "Dangerous Donald" as they have coined him. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q="Donald+trump" https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q="Donald+trump" https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q="Dangerous+Donald" https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q="Dangerous+Donald"
- verz 10y agoLuis Miranda suggests that Hillary isnt already supporting dicators and Trump doesnt support Israel. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4736 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4736 * Trump's threat to pull back from our most important military alliances<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-and-the-end-of-nato/2016/03/04/e8c4b9ca-e146-11e5-8d98-4b3d9215ade1_story.html> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-and-the... like NATO, pull aid from our allies like Israel, and his gushing praise for dictators would put our country on a dangerous path.
- mschip 10y agoGreg Sargent of WaPo seems to have a pretty friendly relationship with the DNC. I'd like to know what they were trying to damage control here: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11242 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11242 edit: Seems they were just scared of the narrative after platform concessions with the Sanders camp: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13370 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13370