> This is fundamentally an issue with the educational system. Change the system the rest will follow. Saying that humans don't work this way is like saying that

> This is fundamentally an issue with the educational system. Change the system the rest will follow. Saying that humans don't work this way is like saying that nothing heavier than air will ever fly. No, it isn't. Check out a book called the Structure of Scientific Revolutions to see how humans really work; even the best and most intellectual of us age and die clinging to old ideas we just can't unlearn. Any future that relies on most people continually learning new and ever changing skills is a future only possible in fantasy. > I don't think that AI and human intelligence will ever completely converge. They don't have to, what I said applies even without strong AI. This notion that AI is only disruptive when it reaches human level is not well thought out. > I think that the world is a "fractal". I think that statement carries no real meaning; I could snazz it up and say I think the world is a quantum fractal, but it's still just technobabble with no meaning.