5 ms·
Despite the calls of "it's not fair!", I can see what he is getting at. From the end-user perspective, it doesn't matter what the underlying technology is: if
by JoelBennett 10y ago
Despite the calls of "it's not fair!", I can see what he is getting at. From the end-user perspective, it doesn't matter what the underlying technology is: if it provides a faster (and more secure) experience, it's a win.
If there was some huge drawback to using HTTP/2, I can see why people might cry foul, but whether they like it or not, HTTP/2 is coming, so we might as well embrace it.
- WorldMaker 10y agoRight, users see HTTP and HTTPS, they don't see /1.0 versus /1.1 versus /2. (There's a good argument that users seeing HTTP versus HTTPS was a mistake, too, versus just secure/unsecure markers in browsers. TLS shouldn't have needed a new port number and URL prefix... but it is way too late to fix that now.)
- josteink 10y ago> if it provides a faster (and more secure) experience, it's a win. Http/2 without tls would be even faster. Had it not been for someone with an agenda deliberately saying it should not be supported.