4 ms·
I never said I'm allergic to open-source, I said I'm allergic to frameworks and the vast majority of libraries out there. That leaves the few gems like React.js
by jeremiep 10y ago
I never said I'm allergic to open-source, I said I'm allergic to frameworks and the vast majority of libraries out there. That leaves the few gems like React.js but they're libraries, not frameworks.
I won't have to write my own framework by not using one, while it may be easier to use one, its far simpler not to use any. You spend so much time trying to fit your use-cases into the framework's paradigm that its usually much faster to just write from scratch. Every single framework I've seen so far had huge scalability issues, they're easy to get started with but you end up crippling your agility as the codebase scales.
As for rolling our own libraries, we can make them specifically for the use-case at hand without anything extra. What's the point of using a few dozen libraries when you only use a fraction of each and now your bundle is megabytes in size? And that's not even counting all the extra code required to wire them all together. There's a reason why we say the web is bloated.