3 ms·
Our site (https://motionarray.com https://motionarray.com) does things differently. We take the entire site's earnings each month and distribute 50% to all of o
by goofyfoot 10y ago
Our site (https://motionarray.com https://motionarray.com) does things differently. We take the entire site's earnings each month and distribute 50% to all of our producers based on their products' download percentages.
For example, if one producer somehow managed to have only their products downloaded for the month, they would take home the entire 50% of the site's earnings.
- opendomain 10y agoYou charge producers FIFTY PERCENT to create content for your website? This is what is wrong with the 'Gig Economy' - you charge too damn much with out providing value yourself or to the sellers. What do you provide for the 50% you are charging? It sure is not web design or marketing - I looked at your website and it looks like you just bought it from ThemeForest.
- goofyfoot 10y agoI'm not going to waste my time with responding to this. You obviously haven't a clue or an eye for design for that matter.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- Quanttek 10y agoNot even Google/Apple take such a large cut and they catually provide more value to their value-creators and they also don't try to sell themselves as altruistic
- chronic81 10y agoIt's okay, his startup will run into the ground in 6 months. Your points are factually correct whereas he has not provided any.
- goofyfoot 10y agoWe're actually very competitive: https://themeforest.net/become-an-author https://themeforest.net/become-an-author https://www.pond5.com/sell-stock-footage https://www.pond5.com/sell-stock-footage http://www.istockphoto.com/sell-stock-photos.php http://www.istockphoto.com/sell-stock-photos.php
- melvinmt 10y ago> I'm not going to waste my time with responding to this. And yet, you did.
- goofyfoot 10y agoHa! 15 seconds, as opposed to minutes. ;)