2 ms·
there's some strange emotional subtext to your posting that i don't quite get. these people can choose what they want to work on. i am not putting a gun to th
by andrewcooke 17y ago
there's some strange emotional subtext to your posting that i don't quite get.
these people can choose what they want to work on. i am not putting a gun to their heads forcing them to do this. nor am i laughing at them.
if they're right - great. who wouldn't want a free lunch? but i don't see the point in painting them as heroes or presenting this work as something successful when, as far as i can see, it is not.
i've done research. you do it because it's interesting, not because of what other people think. and everyone has problems with funding: it's a market; if there's more money in one area there are more people too.
as i said, i'm not sure why you're so emotionally involved with this, but it doesn't seem healthy. if you're involved in cold fusion maybe you should look elsewhere, because science isn't really about being loved or acclaimed by the public...
- limist 17y agoThanks for playing psychiatrist. I'm not sure why you think I'm emotional about this. Are you? BTW, if you do research solely by what you find interesting, more power to you. But to propose that most or all researchers do so, while not caring what their colleagues and peers think, doesn't square with well-documented reality (e.g. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions).