Both MIT and AGPL are Free and Open Source Software licenses, by the very official (FSF and OSI) definitions. I don't think there's any need to disagree here.

Both MIT and AGPL are Free and Open Source Software licenses, by the very official (FSF and OSI) definitions. I don't think there's any need to disagree here. One provides a way to create a proprietary non-free derivatives/builds, granting more freedom to the non-end-user developers who use the code. Another provides a way to ensure end-users always have certain freedoms. Debating which is better is meaningless, as it's just a matter of personal preference. We should avoid that.