4 ms·
Well, call me a pessimist but they should ask people to estimate when it would be rejected. Apple will use the standard response that it replicates functionali
by yumraj 17y ago
Well, call me a pessimist but they should ask people to estimate when it would be rejected.
Apple will use the standard response that it replicates functionality already present in the iPhone, i.e. Safari, and could/would confuse users.
I'd be extremely happy if I'm provided wrong.
A request to Apple fanboys: Kindly reply with why before you downvote me.
- pclark 17y agodownvoted because there are already browsers in the app store that "replicate functionality already present in the iPhone"
- carussell 17y agoCall bullshit on the idea in those words, sure. But don't downvote the comment that describes it. That's the actual rationale developers have received for app rejections in the past.
- pclark 17y agowhen was the last account of this happening? i haven't read much about a rejection of that kind for ages.
- ubernostrum 17y agoDo those browsers ship with and use their own rendering engines? Or do they simply delegate the rendering to webkit? I ask because every iPhone app I've ever seen which offers any form of web-browsing ability does the latter; offering the ability to browse is fine, shipping a complete stack including rendering engine violates the app store terms.