3 ms·

Hmm... I'm not granting anything in your post because there are a number o inaccuracies... But... The level of debate that existed during the primaries, that c

Hmm... I'm not granting anything in your post because there are a number o inaccuracies... But... The level of debate that existed during the primaries, that continues to exist inside the party, the discussion of supporting a 3rd party candidate (in this case libertarian) is all centered around principles and positions. Meanwhile, the complete lack of candidates, let alone debate among the democrats during the primary, the fait accompli of nominating Hillary, the complete disinterest in holding her accountable for breaking the law and putting national security at risk.... This is all centered around power.

mikeash 10y ago
What inaccuracies? I can accept that "no consistent positions on anything" is probably going to be debated, but the rest seems pretty much factual as far as I know. If the result was this guy, does it even matter if the primary debates were centered around principles? I'm not commenting on the Democrats here, so the nature of their process is not really relevant. I am not arguing for them in any way, and will cast my vote in that direction only with great reluctance.