3 ms·
> It comes down to user experience Indeed, it does. My experience visiting SPAs is frankly one of annoyance. Somehow, with 32GB of memory, dual SSDs and an i7
by virtualwhys 10y ago
> It comes down to user experience
Indeed, it does. My experience visiting SPAs is frankly one of annoyance. Somehow, with 32GB of memory, dual SSDs and an i7 extreme processor, the browser grinds to a crawl with at least 1 CPU core maxed out for however long it takes for the extraneous (to me) transition/effect to complete. As a side effect the CPU fan kicks in for my auditory pleasure.
Compare that to a traditional web page where the browser only needs to handle a small fragment of html after initial page load, which typically makes for blazing fast page transitions, indistinguishable from SPA transitions.
I get the benefit of offloading work to the client when scalability is an issue, but for a static blog site? Not so much, I'd say using React in this case is less about the user experience and more about the developer's.
- jamra 10y agoI agree with you. Plus, if you use Cloudflare, your server may not even take the burden of the request. They will do the caching of static content for you.
- escapee 10y ago> My experience visiting SPAs is frankly one of annoyance. I will echo this. SPAs can be great when done well, but my experience with them as a user suggests they're easy to do poorly.