3 ms·
"Market Destruction" is so much more accurate, yes. I suppose though, that in the sense of there being value in a company that Does 'X' for a high premium is lo
by Aelinsaar 10y ago
"Market Destruction" is so much more accurate, yes. I suppose though, that in the sense of there being value in a company that Does 'X' for a high premium is lost when another company does 'X' without that high premium.
Still, that's a secondary effect brought on by the "Market Destruction" as you say.